On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:31:28AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
Serge,
I don't think that is in any way a problem. Is migrating to older
versions ever actually expected to work? In either case I don't
think for this particular case it's a problem.
Good; no; and good - respectively.
Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com):
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:31:28AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
Serge,
I don't think that is in any way a problem. Is migrating to older
versions ever actually expected to work? In either case I don't
think for this particular case it's a
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:08:31PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com):
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:31:28AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
Serge,
I don't think that is in any way a problem. Is migrating to older
versions ever actually expected to
Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:08:31PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com):
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:31:28AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
Serge,
I don't think that is in any way a problem. Is migrating
On 4 Aug 2014, at 16:38, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
If you really want it to be called pc-1.0, you
can make it a machine property instead.
E.g. qemu-kvm-compatibility.
Teach management to set it if remote is qemu-kvm:
-machine pc-1.0,qemu-kvm-compatibility=on
That
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:47:11PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
On 4 Aug 2014, at 16:38, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
If you really want it to be called pc-1.0, you
can make it a machine property instead.
E.g. qemu-kvm-compatibility.
Teach management to set it if remote
Serge,
I don't think that is in any way a problem. Is migrating to older
versions ever actually expected to work? In either case I don't
think for this particular case it's a problem.
Good; no; and good - respectively.
(The how to handle this in libvirt question is more interesting)
I've
Quoting Alex Bligh (a...@alex.org.uk):
Serge,
I don't think that is in any way a problem. Is migrating to older
versions ever actually expected to work? In either case I don't
think for this particular case it's a problem.
Good; no; and good - respectively.
(The how to handle
On 29 Jul 2014, at 14:03, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com wrote:
That sounds good.
And from there I think the thing to do will be to introduce a transient
alternate package that has the pc-1.0 alias pointing ot pc-1.0-qemu-kvm and
depends on the legacy pxe rom. And maybe users can then
Il 29/07/2014 15:03, Serge E. Hallyn ha scritto:
And from there I think the thing to do will be to introduce a transient
alternate package that has the pc-1.0 alias pointing ot pc-1.0-qemu-kvm
This should be done in the main package, too.
and depends on the legacy pxe rom.
If you can make
Quoting Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com):
Il 29/07/2014 15:03, Serge E. Hallyn ha scritto:
And from there I think the thing to do will be to introduce a transient
alternate package that has the pc-1.0 alias pointing ot pc-1.0-qemu-kvm
This should be done in the main package, too.
Il 29/07/2014 15:27, Serge Hallyn ha scritto:
Quoting Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com):
Il 29/07/2014 15:03, Serge E. Hallyn ha scritto:
And from there I think the thing to do will be to introduce a transient
alternate package that has the pc-1.0 alias pointing ot pc-1.0-qemu-kvm
This
On 29 Jul 2014, at 14:21, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
If you can make the pxe-virtio.rom file 64k or less, then that would be
a good idea for 14.04 in general. Newer machine types use
efi-virtio.rom, so you won't break -M pc migration.
Without further, won't that break
On 29 Jul 2014, at 14:35, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not sure either. You could simply package the 12.04 ipxe ROMs into
14.04, and add a note about getting the sources for GPL friendliness.
This would be my preference (or in Ubuntu's case, add it to the ipxe-qemu
package)
Quoting Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com):
Il 29/07/2014 15:27, Serge Hallyn ha scritto:
Quoting Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com):
Il 29/07/2014 15:03, Serge E. Hallyn ha scritto:
And from there I think the thing to do will be to introduce a transient
alternate package that has the
Quoting Alex Bligh (a...@alex.org.uk):
On 29 Jul 2014, at 14:21, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
If you can make the pxe-virtio.rom file 64k or less, then that would be
a good idea for 14.04 in general. Newer machine types use
efi-virtio.rom, so you won't break -M pc
Il 29/07/2014 15:39, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
I'm not sure either. You could simply package the 12.04 ipxe ROMs into
14.04, and add a note about getting the sources for GPL friendliness.
This would be my preference (or in Ubuntu's case, add it to the ipxe-qemu
package) but I think it should
On 29 Jul 2014, at 14:42, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 29/07/2014 15:39, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
I'm not sure either. You could simply package the 12.04 ipxe ROMs into
14.04, and add a note about getting the sources for GPL friendliness.
This would be my preference (or in
Il 29/07/2014 15:56, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
On 29 Jul 2014, at 14:42, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 29/07/2014 15:39, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
I'm not sure either. You could simply package the 12.04 ipxe ROMs into
14.04, and add a note about getting the sources for GPL
On 29 Jul 2014, at 15:00, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
efi-virtio.rom contains both BIOS and UEFI ROMs.
You learn a new thing every day.
You're right, but in Serge's shoes I wouldn't bother about anything
except LTS.
Certainly this would be the most convenient path for me (with
On 22 Jul 2014, at 19:43, Alex Bligh a...@alex.org.uk wrote:
Testing has been light to date (i.e.
can I migrate it inbound with -S without anything complaining).
I've given this quite a bit more testing today.
It works fine qemu-kvm 1.0 - qemu-2.0+patch (cirrus vga)
It works fine
Andreas,
On 27 Jul 2014, at 15:10, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Alex,
+ quintela, mst, libvirt
Thanks for your comments!
This sounds like a really cool feature that SUSE would probably be
interested in extending back to 0.14 and 0.15, but I see a fundamental
flaw: libvirt
Quoting Alex Bligh (a...@alex.org.uk):
On 22 Jul 2014, at 19:43, Alex Bligh a...@alex.org.uk wrote:
Testing has been light to date (i.e.
can I migrate it inbound with -S without anything complaining).
thanks, Alex!
I've given this quite a bit more testing today.
It works fine
Hi Alex,
+ quintela, mst, libvirt
Am 22.07.2014 20:43, schrieb Alex Bligh:
Add a machine type pc-1.0-qemu-kvm for live migrate compatibility
with qemu-kvm version 1.0.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bligh a...@alex.org.uk
---
hw/acpi/piix4.c | 49
24 matches
Mail list logo
