On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:38:14AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 04:00:42PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:05:12 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/24/2013 10:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Event message contains
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 04:00:42PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:05:12 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/24/2013 10:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Event message contains the net client name, management might only want
to query the single net
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/24/2013 06:23 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
I don't think we need this argument. This command is quite simple in its
response, let's do this filtering in HMP only.
Event message
On 05/24/2013 10:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Event message contains the net client name, management might only want
to query the single net client.
The client can do the filtering itself.
I'm not sure I buy the responsiveness argument. Sure, the fastest I/O
is no I/O, but whether
On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:05:12 -0600
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/24/2013 10:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Event message contains the net client name, management might only want
to query the single net client.
The client can do the filtering itself.
I'm not sure I
