On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:25:58AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:30:07AM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is the sequence sent to disconnect only the host side, then
reconnect it with a new tap
Laine Stump la...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/15/2012 05:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:30:07AM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is the sequence sent to disconnect only the host side, then
reconnect it
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:15:30AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 10/15/2012 05:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:30:07AM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is the sequence sent to disconnect only the host
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:25:58AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:30:07AM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is the sequence sent to
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is the sequence sent to disconnect only the host side, then
reconnect it with a new tap device. (although the fd is the same, this
is because the old tap device had already been closed, so the number is
just being used - the
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:30:07AM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is the sequence sent to disconnect only the host side, then
reconnect it with a new tap device. (although the fd is the same, this
is because the old tap device
On 10/15/2012 05:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:30:07AM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:47:14PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
Here is the sequence sent to disconnect only the host side, then
reconnect it with a new tap device. (although the fd
