Re: [libvirt] [RFC/PATCH python] expose the bindings version to Python

2013-12-31 Thread Roman Bogorodskiy
Doug Goldstein wrote: On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/11/2013 08:43 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: The method getVersion() retrieves the version of the libvirt library that the binaries are linked against but there is no way to retrieve the version

Re: [libvirt] [RFC/PATCH python] expose the bindings version to Python

2013-12-29 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/11/2013 08:43 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: The method getVersion() retrieves the version of the libvirt library that the binaries are linked against but there is no way to retrieve the version of the bindings you are

Re: [libvirt] [RFC/PATCH python] expose the bindings version to Python

2013-12-12 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/11/2013 08:43 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: The method getVersion() retrieves the version of the libvirt library that the binaries are linked against but there is no way to retrieve the version of the bindings you are using. In the future if we support new APIs in Python that don't rely on

[libvirt] [RFC/PATCH python] expose the bindings version to Python

2013-12-11 Thread Doug Goldstein
The method getVersion() retrieves the version of the libvirt library that the binaries are linked against but there is no way to retrieve the version of the bindings you are using. In the future if we support new APIs in Python that don't rely on features in the library there needs to be a way for