On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:27:58AM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> Apologies for not responding. I've come down with a cold
> (not flu) for several days...
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
[...]
> > Just to make sure, this is not ready, right ?
> > We freeze for libvirt-0
Apologies for not responding. I've come down with a cold
(not flu) for several days...
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:01:07PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've updated the patch. The change includes support for multiple mount
>> points
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:01:07PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> Hi,
> I've updated the patch. The change includes support for multiple mount
> points of cgroups that I didn't cope with in the previous patch.
>
> Through the work, I found a bit messy problem. Current lxc controller writes
> pid in a
Quoting Ryota Ozaki (ozaki.ry...@gmail.com):
> I've updated the patch. The change includes support for multiple mount
> points of cgroups that I didn't cope with in the previous patch.
>
> Through the work, I found a bit messy problem. Current lxc controller writes
> pid in a 'tasks' file multiple
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> Hi Serge and Daniel,
>>
>> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>> Quoting Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com):
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:34:12
Hi,
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> Hi Serge and Daniel,
>
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com):
>>> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:34:12AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>> > Quoting Ryota Ozaki (ozaki.ry.
Hi Serge and Daniel,
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com):
>> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:34:12AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Ryota Ozaki (ozaki.ry...@gmail.com):
>> > > Hi Serge,
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 8, 2009
Quoting Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com):
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:34:12AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Ryota Ozaki (ozaki.ry...@gmail.com):
> > > Hi Serge,
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > IIUC, the real problem is that src/cgro
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 08:34:12AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Ryota Ozaki (ozaki.ry...@gmail.com):
> > Hi Serge,
> >
> > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > IIUC, the real problem is that src/cgroup.c assumes that the
> > > cgroup name should be $CGROUP_MOUN
Quoting Ryota Ozaki (ozaki.ry...@gmail.com):
> Hi Serge,
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > IIUC, the real problem is that src/cgroup.c assumes that the
> > cgroup name should be $CGROUP_MOUNTPOINT/groupname. But of
> > course if the ns cgroup is enabled, then the un
Hi Serge,
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> IIUC, the real problem is that src/cgroup.c assumes that the
> cgroup name should be $CGROUP_MOUNTPOINT/groupname. But of
> course if the ns cgroup is enabled, then the unshare(CLONE_NEWNS)
> to create a new namespace in which t
IIUC, the real problem is that src/cgroup.c assumes that the
cgroup name should be $CGROUP_MOUNTPOINT/groupname. But of
course if the ns cgroup is enabled, then the unshare(CLONE_NEWNS)
to create a new namespace in which to mount the new devpts
locks the driver under $CGROUP_MOUNTPOINT//
or somesu
Hi,
lxc does not work if ns cgroups subsystem is enabled because
of two factors; one is that ns has a special rule to create
a group[*] unlike other subsystems and the other is lxc
controller creates a new namespace for /dev/pts prior to
create a new group for a domain. Unfortunately the new
names
13 matches
Mail list logo
