On 07/01/2013 07:57 PM, Gao feng wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 07:05 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 01.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 01.07.2013 04:26, schrieb Gao feng:
>> Well, given that we're at rc2 no
On 07/01/2013 07:05 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 01.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 01.07.2013 04:26, schrieb Gao feng:
> Well, given that we're at rc2 now & I'm still unclear about how some
> asp
Am 01.07.2013 13:44, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Am 01.07.2013 13:35, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 01.07.2013 13:22, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
Am 01.07.2013 13:35, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 01.07.2013 13:22, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 01.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 01.07.2013 13:22, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 01.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Richar
Am 01.07.2013 13:22, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 01.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Any ideas what's going on here?
>>>
>>> No, it is v
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 01.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Any ideas what's going on here?
> >
> > No, it is very odd. It smells like a kernel issue to me. What
Am 01.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 01.07.2013 04:26, schrieb Gao feng:
Well, given that we're at rc2 now & I'm still unclear about how some
aspects of the userns setup is working, I'm afraid we'll ha
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:29:14AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 01.07.2013 04:26, schrieb Gao feng:
> >> Well, given that we're at rc2 now & I'm still unclear about how some
> >> aspects of the userns setup is working, I'm afraid we'll have to wait
> >> until 1.1.1 for the userns LXC code
Am 01.07.2013 04:26, schrieb Gao feng:
>> Well, given that we're at rc2 now & I'm still unclear about how some
>> aspects of the userns setup is working, I'm afraid we'll have to wait
>> until 1.1.1 for the userns LXC code to merge. I'll aim todo it next
>> week, so that we have plenty of time for
On 06/28/2013 06:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:56:25AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> On 06/26/2013 07:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:56:19PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
On 06/26/2013 05:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:56:25AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 07:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:56:19PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2013 05:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> O
On 06/26/2013 07:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:56:19PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> On 06/26/2013 05:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
On 06/26/2013 04:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1
On 06/26/2013 07:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:56:19PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> On 06/26/2013 05:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
On 06/26/2013 04:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:56:19PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 05:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2013 04:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote
On 06/26/2013 05:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> On 06/26/2013 04:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Within a user namespace root can remount these filesysems a
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 04:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Within a user namespace root can remount these filesysems at any
> >> time rw.
> >> Create these mappings only i
On 06/26/2013 04:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Within a user namespace root can remount these filesysems at any
>> time rw.
>> Create these mappings only if we're not playing with user namespaces.
>
> This is a problem wit
On 06/14/2013 02:02 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Within a user namespace root can remount these filesysems at any
> time rw.
> Create these mappings only if we're not playing with user namespaces.
Without user namespace,the root user of container can remount all of the
filesystem too, since he
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:02:18PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Within a user namespace root can remount these filesysems at any
> time rw.
> Create these mappings only if we're not playing with user namespaces.
This is a problem with the way we're initializing mounts in the
user namespace.
Within a user namespace root can remount these filesysems at any
time rw.
Create these mappings only if we're not playing with user namespaces.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
src/lxc/lxc_container.c | 42 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 dele
21 matches
Mail list logo