On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:41:55PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
This is returning a char *
capabilities
host
cpu
modelxxx/model
/cpu
/host
/capabilities
while the next patch
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Christophe Fergeau
cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:41:55PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
This is returning a char *
capabilities
host
cpu
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:56:18PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Ah so you mean that I use the same object to represent both? I'm not
sure that makes sense since they are part of different XMLs and
therefore different entities. I'm not sure here.
We already have GVirConfigDomainCpu which
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:56:18PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Ah so you mean that I use the same object to represent both? I'm not
sure that makes sense since they are part of different XMLs and
therefore
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
This is returning a char *
capabilities
host
cpu
modelxxx/model
/cpu
/host
/capabilities
while the next patch exposes the model from the /domain/cpu/model node
as an actual object, why the
This is returning a char *
capabilities
host
cpu
modelxxx/model
/cpu
/host
/capabilities
while the next patch exposes the model from the /domain/cpu/model node
as an actual object, why the difference?
Christophe
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 02:51:26PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Add a method to get the model of the CPU from capabilities.
---
libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-capabilities-cpu.c | 6 ++
libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-capabilities-cpu.h | 2 ++
libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym| 2 ++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git
