On 10/12/2011 03:50 PM, David L Stevens wrote:
This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate placeholders for
chains that are referenced without generating a rule for them immediately.
Finally, it includes
Stefan Berger stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote on 10/17/2011 09:07:12
AM:
On 10/12/2011 03:50 PM, David L Stevens wrote:
This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate placeholders
for
chains that are
On 10/17/2011 01:23 PM, David Stevens wrote:
Stefan Bergerstef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote on 10/17/2011 09:07:12
AM:
On 10/12/2011 03:50 PM, David L Stevens wrote:
This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate
Stefan Berger stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote on 10/17/2011 10:31:29
AM:
was not.
Yes, then I understood this correctly. See the other mails regarding the
problems I am seeing with it. If there was a way to figure out at what
position to insert a rule into an existing chain, i.e. at
On 10/17/2011 01:58 PM, David Stevens wrote:
Stefan Bergerstef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote on 10/17/2011 10:31:29
AM:
was not.
Yes, then I understood this correctly. See the other mails regarding the
problems I am seeing with it. If there was a way to figure out at what
position to insert a
This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate placeholders for
chains that are referenced without generating a rule for them immediately.
Finally, it includes variable matching for filter instantiation
(i.e.,
