On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 04:56:15AM +, Yuan, Hang wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> Can I know your status on the boot display support work? I'm interested to
> try it in some real use cases.
https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/qemu/log/?h=sirius/ramfb-vfio
Most of the bits needed (general ramfb support) is
Expose vfio device display/migration to libvirt and above, was
> Re:
> [PATCH 0/3] sample: vfio mdev display devices.
>
> Hi,
>
> > This raises another question, is the configuration of the emulated
> > graphics a factor in the handling the mdev device's display option?
&g
On Thu, 10 May 2018 13:00:29 +0200
Erik Skultety wrote:
> ...
>
> > > Now, if we (theoretically) can settle on easing the restrictions Alex
> > > has mentioned, we in fact could introduce a QMP command to probe
> > > these devices and provide libvirt with useful information
...
> > Now, if we (theoretically) can settle on easing the restrictions Alex
> > has mentioned, we in fact could introduce a QMP command to probe
> > these devices and provide libvirt with useful information at that
> > point in time. Of course, since the 3rd party vendor is "de-coupled"
> >
Hi,
> This raises another question, is the configuration of the emulated
> graphics a factor in the handling the mdev device's display option?
> AFAIK, neither vGPU vendor provides a VBIOS for boot graphics, so even
> with a display option, we're mostly targeting a secondary graphics
> head,
Hi,
> Maybe some guiding questions:
>
> - Will dma-buf always require GL support?
Yes.
> - Does GL support limit our ability to have a display over a remote
>connection?
Currently yes, althrough the plan is to support gl display remotely in
spice. The workflow will be completely
On Fri, 4 May 2018 10:16:09 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:58:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The previous discussion hasn't produced results, so let's start over.
> > Here's the situation:
> >
> > - We currently have
On Fri, 4 May 2018 09:49:44 +0200
Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:58:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The previous discussion hasn't produced results, so let's start over.
> > Here's the situation:
> >
> > - We currently have kernel and
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:58:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The previous discussion hasn't produced results, so let's start over.
> Here's the situation:
>
> - We currently have kernel and QEMU support for the QEMU vfio-pci
>display option.
>
> - The default for this option
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:58:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The previous discussion hasn't produced results, so let's start over.
> Here's the situation:
>
> - We currently have kernel and QEMU support for the QEMU vfio-pci
>display option.
>
> - The default for this option is
Hi,
The previous discussion hasn't produced results, so let's start over.
Here's the situation:
- We currently have kernel and QEMU support for the QEMU vfio-pci
display option.
- The default for this option is 'auto', so the device will attempt to
generate a display if the underlying
11 matches
Mail list logo