On 14.07.2014 16:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 14/07/2014 11:27, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
-drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
-drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
It's safer to add ,unit=0 and ,unit=1 too.
We already use loader/ for specifying alternative
Il 18/07/2014 15:01, Michal Privoznik ha scritto:
On 14.07.2014 16:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 14/07/2014 11:27, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
-drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
-drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
It's safer to add ,unit=0 and ,unit=1 too.
We
Dear list,
there's been a lot of development in QEMU on this part. And I think it's
settled down enough long so I can start looking at it. So I'd like to
hear you opinion what's the best way to expose this in libvirt.
OVMF can bee looked at as a UEFI enablement in guest. Standard UEFI
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Dear list,
there's been a lot of development in QEMU on this part. And I think it's
settled down enough long so I can start looking at it. So I'd like to hear
you opinion what's the best way to expose this in libvirt.
OVMF
On 07/14/14 11:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Dear list,
there's been a lot of development in QEMU on this part. And I think it's
settled down enough long so I can start looking at it. So I'd like to hear
you opinion what's the
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:55:52AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 07/14/14 11:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Dear list,
there's been a lot of development in QEMU on this part. And I think it's
settled down enough long so I
Il 14/07/2014 11:27, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
-drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
-drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
It's safer to add ,unit=0 and ,unit=1 too.
We already use loader/ for specifying alternative BIOS blobs for
the QEMU -bios arg. Since you
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 14/07/2014 11:27, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
-drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
-drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
It's safer to add ,unit=0 and ,unit=1 too.
Is there any compelling reason
Il 14/07/2014 16:43, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
-drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
-drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
It's safer to add ,unit=0 and ,unit=1 too.
Is there any compelling reason to make the unit numbers user
configurable. Are they guest ABI
