On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:18:17PM -0500, John Levon wrote:
3. The Sun repository *is* the upstream for xend on Solaris for a number
of reasons:
a. The 3.1.x series is only maintained by us, there is no other 3.1
upstream
b. The XenSource upstream does not, and cannot,
I wanted to bring this topic out of a patch review thread.
Dan recently stated that only patches that use upstream facilities are
acceptable, meaning the xend delivered by XenSource. I'd like to make a
few points on this note:
1. I'd like to hear from the other core maintainers if they agree
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:54:51PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
2. I'd like to hear a rationale for this rule.
The number one rule is not to fork codebases in incompatible ways.
Agreed. Thankfully, we haven't done that.
Adding new features to a particular version of Xen and not making
