On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:06:27AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:41:12PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On 04/03/2012 01:05 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Do either of the Dan's have a strong opinion? And if the consen
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:41:12PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On 04/03/2012 01:05 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> We're quite inconsistent on US (canceled) vs. UK (cancelled) spelling in
> >> our public API:
> >>
> >> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in:124:
On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 01:05 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We're quite inconsistent on US (canceled) vs. UK (cancelled) spelling in
>> our public API:
>>
>> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in:124:
>> VIR_DOMAIN_RUNNING_MIGRATION_CANCELED = 6, /* returned from migrati
On 04/03/2012 01:05 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> We're quite inconsistent on US (canceled) vs. UK (cancelled) spelling in
> our public API:
>
> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in:124:
> VIR_DOMAIN_RUNNING_MIGRATION_CANCELED = 6, /* returned from migration */
> include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in:125:VIR_DOMAIN
We're quite inconsistent on US (canceled) vs. UK (cancelled) spelling in
our public API:
include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in:124:
VIR_DOMAIN_RUNNING_MIGRATION_CANCELED = 6, /* returned from migration */
include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in:125:VIR_DOMAIN_RUNNING_SAVE_CANCELED =
7, /* returned from failed