On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:51:15PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 7/22/20 1:21 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Historically we avoided -fstack-protector* since it resulted in a broken
> > build on Mingw. In GCC 10 in Fedora though, we have the opposite problem,
> > getting a broken build if we
On 7/22/20 1:21 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Historically we avoided -fstack-protector* since it resulted in a broken
build on Mingw. In GCC 10 in Fedora though, we have the opposite problem,
getting a broken build if we don't enable one of the -fstack-protector*
options. This also works in GCC
Historically we avoided -fstack-protector* since it resulted in a broken
build on Mingw. In GCC 10 in Fedora though, we have the opposite problem,
getting a broken build if we don't enable one of the -fstack-protector*
options. This also works in GCC 9, so we don't need to worry about the
old
