On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 19:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 08:20:12PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > We could special-case binaries called 'virt-nc' and use our internal
> > syntax for those. Having two separate URI parameters to control the
> > same knob sounds
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 08:20:12PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 18:21 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 07:18:55PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > The other day I randomly realized the ssh-based transports already
> > > accept a 'netcat'
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 18:21 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 07:18:55PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > The other day I randomly realized the ssh-based transports already
> > accept a 'netcat' URI parameter which can be used to point libvirt
> > to a non-standard nc
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 07:18:55PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 16:11 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 14:25 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:25:14PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > > Mh, that makes sense but
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 16:11 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 14:25 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:25:14PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > Mh, that makes sense but I'm still wary of using "proxy" due to the
> > > potential for confusion,
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 14:25 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:25:14PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Mh, that makes sense but I'm still wary of using "proxy" due to the
> > potential for confusion, since in this case the proxy is on the
> > opposite side of the
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:25:14PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 11:00 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:21:47PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > Just a couple of comments about the UI: would it make sense to use
> > > something like
> > >
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 11:00 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:21:47PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Just a couple of comments about the UI: would it make sense to use
> > something like
> >
> > qemu+ssh://host/system?tunnelcmd=virt-tunnel
> >
> > instead?
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:21:47PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 19:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > This wires up support for using the new virt-nc binary with the ssh,
> > libssh and libssh2 protocols.
> >
> > The new binary will be used preferentially if it is
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 19:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> This wires up support for using the new virt-nc binary with the ssh,
> libssh and libssh2 protocols.
>
> The new binary will be used preferentially if it is available in $PATH,
> otherwise we fall back to traditional netcat.
>
> The
On 7/9/20 8:36 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
This wires up support for using the new virt-nc binary with the ssh,
libssh and libssh2 protocols.
The new binary will be used preferentially if it is available in $PATH,
otherwise we fall back to traditional netcat.
The "proxy" URI parameter can be
This wires up support for using the new virt-nc binary with the ssh,
libssh and libssh2 protocols.
The new binary will be used preferentially if it is available in $PATH,
otherwise we fall back to traditional netcat.
The "proxy" URI parameter can be used to force use of netcat e.g.
12 matches
Mail list logo
