Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread beth kon
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: beth kon wrote: Patch for accessing available memory. --- libvirt.danielpatch/src/driver.h2007-09-11 15:29:43.0 -0400 +++ libvirt.cellsMemory/src/driver.h2007-09-27 18:39:52.0 -0400 @@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ typedef virDriver *virDriverPtr;

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
beth kon wrote: Patch for accessing available memory. --- libvirt.danielpatch/src/driver.h2007-09-11 15:29:43.0 -0400 +++ libvirt.cellsMemory/src/driver.h2007-09-27 18:39:52.0 -0400 @@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ typedef virDriver *virDriverPtr; typedef int

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread beth kon
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:52:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: # src/virsh capabilities [...] topology cells num='1' cell id='0' cpus num='4' cpu id='0'/ cpu id='1'/ cpu id='2'/ cpu id='3'/ /cpus

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
My results are a bit inconclusive. I have a machine here which supposedly supports NUMA (2 socket, 2 core AMD with hypertransport and two separate banks of RAM). BIOS is _not_ configured to interleave memory. Other BIOS settings lead me to suppose that NUMA is enabled (or at least not

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread beth kon
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: beth kon wrote: Patch for accessing available memory. --- libvirt.danielpatch/src/driver.h2007-09-11 15:29:43.0 -0400 +++ libvirt.cellsMemory/src/driver.h2007-09-27 18:39:52.0 -0400 @@ -258,8 +258,9 @@ typedef virDriver *virDriverPtr;

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread Ryan Harper
* Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-28 11:20]: beth kon wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: My results are a bit inconclusive. I have a machine here which supposedly supports NUMA (2 socket, 2 core AMD with hypertransport and two separate banks of RAM). BIOS is _not_

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
beth kon wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: My results are a bit inconclusive. I have a machine here which supposedly supports NUMA (2 socket, 2 core AMD with hypertransport and two separate banks of RAM). BIOS is _not_ configured to interleave memory. Other BIOS settings lead me to

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread beth kon
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: My results are a bit inconclusive. I have a machine here which supposedly supports NUMA (2 socket, 2 core AMD with hypertransport and two separate banks of RAM). BIOS is _not_ configured to interleave memory. Other BIOS settings lead me to suppose that NUMA is

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:52:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: # src/virsh capabilities [...] topology cells num='1' cell id='0' cpus num='4' cpu id='0'/ cpu id='1'/ cpu id='2'/ cpu id='3'/ /cpus /cell

Re: [Libvir] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Tested NUMA patches for available memory and topology

2007-09-28 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:42:10AM -0400, beth kon wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: beth kon wrote: Patch for accessing available memory. --- libvirt.danielpatch/src/driver.h2007-09-11 15:29:43.0 -0400 +++ libvirt.cellsMemory/src/driver.h2007-09-27 18:39:52.0