Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/08/20 19:26, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 09/07/20 16:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07,

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/08/20 14:28, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 9/8/20 1:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek > > Thank you, pushed. Thank *you* for the patch. :) Laszlo

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/07/20 16:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >> On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 9/8/20 1:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek Thank you, pushed. Michal

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/08/20 12:05, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 9/8/20 11:02 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 09/07/20 15:48, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>> Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it >>> missed my patches: users should prefer over fwcfg. >>> The reason is that fwcfg is considered

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/08/20 11:12, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:02:10AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 09/07/20 15:48, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>> Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it >>> missed my patches: users should prefer over fwcfg. >>> The reason is

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/08/20 11:05, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 09/08/20 08:37, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 9/8/20 11:02 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: On 09/07/20 15:48, Michal Privoznik wrote: Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it missed my patches: users should prefer over fwcfg. The reason is that fwcfg is considered somewhat internal to QEMU and it has limited number of

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:02:10AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/07/20 15:48, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it > > missed my patches: users should prefer over fwcfg. > > The reason is that fwcfg is considered somewhat internal to QEMU

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/08/20 08:37, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >>> On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/07/20 15:48, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it > missed my patches: users should prefer over fwcfg. > The reason is that fwcfg is considered somewhat internal to QEMU > and it has limited number of slots and neither of these applies > to

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: On 09/08/20 08:37, Martin Kletzander wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon,

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/08/20 08:37, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >>> On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 09/07/20 16:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:03:46AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:37:03AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > On 9/7/20 3:57 PM,

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:37:03AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-08 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:38:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > Even though this was brought up in upstream

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-07 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:20:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it > > > missed my patches: users should prefer

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-07 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 9/7/20 3:57 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it missed my patches: users should prefer over fwcfg. The reason is that fwcfg is considered somewhat internal to QEMU and it

Re: [PATCH] docs: Discourage users from using fwcfg

2020-09-07 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: Even though this was brought up in upstream discussion [1] it missed my patches: users should prefer over fwcfg. The reason is that fwcfg is considered somewhat internal to QEMU and it has limited number of slots and neither of