Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] portability: handle ifreq differences in virnetdev

2013-05-02 Thread Roman Bogorodskiy
Eric Blake wrote: From: Roman Bogorodskiy bogorods...@gmail.com FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as: - uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting interface names - uses ifr_index instead of ifr_ifindex

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] portability: handle ifreq differences in virnetdev

2013-04-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/29/2013 11:48 AM, Eric Blake wrote: On 04/27/2013 09:50 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as: - uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting interface names - uses ifr_index

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] portability: handle ifreq differences in virnetdev

2013-04-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/27/2013 09:50 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: FreeBSD (and maybe other BSDs) have different member names in struct ifreq when compared to Linux, such as: - uses ifr_data instead of ifr_newname for setting interface names - uses ifr_index instead of ifr_ifindex for interface