On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:44:33PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
We don't know exactly the names of the VFIO devices that will be
needed (and due to hotplug, we can't ever assume we won't need them at
all), so we just add an ACL to allow any vfio device - they all have
the major number 244
On 04/26/2013 04:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:44:33PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
We don't know exactly the names of the VFIO devices that will be
needed (and due to hotplug, we can't ever assume we won't need them at
all), so we just add an ACL to allow any vfio
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:16:14AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/26/2013 04:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:44:33PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
We don't know exactly the names of the VFIO devices that will be
needed (and due to hotplug, we can't ever assume we
On 04/26/2013 11:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:16:14AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/26/2013 04:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:44:33PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
We don't know exactly the names of the VFIO devices that will be
needed
On 04/26/2013 09:55 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
We manage perfectly well to configure ACLs for individual disks that
a VM is given without having to wildcard allow every single /dev/sdN
disk. That fact that you were able to make the security drivers label
the /dev/vfio/n devices correctly, shows