On 17.02.2017 11:23, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 16:15:02 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 17:39:15 +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
>>> qemuMigrationFetchJobStatus is rather inconvinient. If we poll
>>> stats for status only then we don't need to
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 16:15:02 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 17:39:15 +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
> > qemuMigrationFetchJobStatus is rather inconvinient. If we poll
> > stats for status only then we don't need to update elapsed time.
> > Next on some paths we use
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 17:39:15 +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
> qemuMigrationFetchJobStatus is rather inconvinient. If we poll
> stats for status only then we don't need to update elapsed time.
> Next on some paths we use this function to get stats only we don't
> what to unexpectedly update
