On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:12:18AM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
On 24/07/13 01:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 18:47, John Ferlan ha scritto:
On 07/23/2013 12:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 18:01, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Paolo
Il 24/07/2013 11:54, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
but anyway, we provide good enough documentations, so if one wants to
use direct mode, he can still change the xml to use it, any big problems
here? though defaulting to direct is more convenient for these users.
Defaulting to direct is
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:25:17PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 11:54, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
but anyway, we provide good enough documentations, so if one wants to
use direct mode, he can still change the xml to use it, any big problems
here? though defaulting to direct
Il 24/07/2013 12:31, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:25:17PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 11:54, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
but anyway, we provide good enough documentations, so if one wants to
use direct mode, he can still change the xml to use it,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:31, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:25:17PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 11:54, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
but anyway, we provide good enough documentations, so if one
Il 24/07/2013 12:39, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:31, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
breaking the default config for QEMU's without iSCSI support.
Understood, that's why I suggested not having a default config
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:41:49PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:39, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:31, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
breaking the default config for QEMU's without iSCSI support.
Il 24/07/2013 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:41:49PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:39, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:31, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
breaking
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:59:27PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:41:49PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/07/2013 12:39, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini
Il 24/07/2013 13:03, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Can you make the pool active, but at the same time not expose it as
devices on the host? LUNs can be discovered by talking directly to the
target (similar to the iscsi-ls command included with libiscsi).
I've never considered that
Il 22/07/2013 12:30, Osier Yang ha scritto:
+def-srcpool-pooltype = pooldef-type;
+if (pooldef-type == VIR_STORAGE_POOL_ISCSI) {
+/* Default to use the LUN's path on host */
+if (!def-srcpool-mode)
+def-srcpool-mode =
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:22:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/07/2013 12:30, Osier Yang ha scritto:
+def-srcpool-pooltype = pooldef-type;
+if (pooldef-type == VIR_STORAGE_POOL_ISCSI) {
+/* Default to use the LUN's path on host */
+if
Il 23/07/2013 15:26, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Ok, this answers my question. :)
I think the default mode should be direct, because otherwise things such
as persistent reservations do not work.
No, the default has to be host mode, because that is the only mode that
is guaranteed
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:29:40PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 15:26, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Ok, this answers my question. :)
I think the default mode should be direct, because otherwise things such
as persistent reservations do not work.
No, the default
Il 23/07/2013 15:36, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:29:40PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 15:26, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Ok, this answers my question. :)
I think the default mode should be direct, because otherwise things such
as persistent
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:52:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 15:36, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:29:40PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 15:26, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Ok, this answers my question. :)
I think the default
Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:52:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 15:36, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:29:40PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 15:26, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Ok, this
Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Perhaps the default could be specified in a configuration file (and the
default should be the safe one).
No, that is even worse because now the default is not predictable..
We simply default to host mode and if applications want to use
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Perhaps the default could be specified in a configuration file (and the
default should be the safe one).
No, that is even worse because now the default is not predictable..
Il 23/07/2013 18:01, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Perhaps the default could be specified in a configuration file (and the
default should be the safe one).
No, that is even
On 07/23/2013 12:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 18:01, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Perhaps the default could be specified in a configuration file (and the
default
Il 23/07/2013 18:47, John Ferlan ha scritto:
On 07/23/2013 12:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 18:01, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
Perhaps the default could be
On 24/07/13 01:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 18:47, John Ferlan ha scritto:
On 07/23/2013 12:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 18:01, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/07/2013 16:14, Daniel P. Berrange ha
On 19/07/13 20:32, John Ferlan wrote:
The difference with already supported pool types (dir, fs, block)
is: there are two modes for iscsi pool (or network pools in future),
one can specify it either to use the volume target path (the path
showed up on host) with mode='host', or to use the remote
24 matches
Mail list logo
