On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 17:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:55:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > So, to be clear, you're advocating for keeping our list of target
> > platforms unchanged and exempt Meson specifically from the implicit
> > requirement we've had
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 14:21 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Jumping in a bit late, but why do we care about this distinction in
> > CI at all? In our existing
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > Another argument from my side was that we require syntax-check and check
> > > to be executed
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 09:36 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Another argument from my side was that we require syntax-check and check
> > to be executed before posting patches to mailing list, having it under
> > single target
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:09:23PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:05:23AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:57 PM Ján Tomko wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:55:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 10:39 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > We certainly could bundle meson with them, but given that in very
> > short time we're going to have libvirt, libvirt-dbus, osinfo-db-tools,
> > libosinfo, gtk-vnc,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:22 AM Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Meson build system is simple and
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 10:39 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> We certainly could bundle meson with them, but given that in very
> short time we're going to have libvirt, libvirt-dbus, osinfo-db-tools,
> libosinfo, gtk-vnc, spice-gtk all using meson, bundling meson in the
> individual tarballs
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:30:14AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:17 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > I didn't go through the patch, will do that in the next days ... but a
> > > few things should be
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:17 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > I didn't go through the patch, will do that in the next days ... but a
> > few things should be considered here:
> > - meson >= 0.49.0 basically means the project won't be
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > >
> > > Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> > > able to fully replace our
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:53:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >
> > Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> > able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
> > it's a fairly new
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:39:17PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> > able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
> > it's a fairly new
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:22 PM Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>
> Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
> able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
> it's a fairly new build system, it requires Python 3.5 and Ninja 1.5.0,
> it's still evolving
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
Meson build system is simple and quick compared to Autotools and it's
able to fully replace our Autotools usage. There are few drawbacks as
it's a fairly new build system, it requires Python 3.5 and Ninja 1.5.0,
it's still evolving
20 matches
Mail list logo
