On 06/09/16 11:52, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:02:19AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
>> On 05/09/16 19:48, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:37:07PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
Hi there,
after my presentation at KVM Forum, it was
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:02:19AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
On 05/09/16 19:48, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:37:07PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
Hi there,
after my presentation at KVM Forum, it was pointed out from the audience
that we might think about doing
On 05/09/16 19:48, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:37:07PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> after my presentation at KVM Forum, it was pointed out from the audience
>> that we might think about doing something about the naming of the
>> virt-admin's comands,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:37:07PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> after my presentation at KVM Forum, it was pointed out from the audience
> that we might think about doing something about the naming of the
> virt-admin's comands, since there is some sort of inconsistency: srv-
> vs.
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:40:30PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 17:37 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > after my presentation at KVM Forum, it was pointed out from the audience
>
> Disclaimer: I'm the audience in question :)
There's always one
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 17:37 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> after my presentation at KVM Forum, it was pointed out from the audience
Disclaimer: I'm the audience in question :)
> that we might think about doing something about the naming of the
> virt-admin's comands, since there is
