On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:58:13PM +0200, Wim ten Have wrote:
> Hi Stefan, sorry for my very late response as I was temporarily out
> and unfortunately missed this email thread.
>
> For your question (remark), yes, you're right. This feature should
> not apply to specific scenario.
> Something
Oh, I also see that my claws-mail filters are in chaos and that there's
additional email to this mail-thread.
On Thu, 21 May 2020 16:14:34 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:23:32PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 20/05/20 19:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
Hi Stefan, sorry for my very late response as I was temporarily out
and unfortunately missed this email thread.
For your question (remark), yes, you're right. This feature should
not apply to specific scenario.
Something else to look into is that the feature can only work if the
serving layer
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:23:32PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 20/05/20 19:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > libvirt refuses to set KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED when the CPU model is not
> > host-passthrough.
> >
> > Is there a reason for this limitation?
> >
> > My understanding is that
On 20/05/20 19:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Hi,
> libvirt refuses to set KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED when the CPU model is not
> host-passthrough.
>
> Is there a reason for this limitation?
>
> My understanding is that KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED means the vCPU is pinned to
> a host CPU that is not shared with