Not sure if related, but after syncing libvirt to latest master branch I
see following errors:
2012-02-04 10:38:00.119+: 18828: error :
virSecurityLabelDefParseXML:2646 : XML error: security label is missing
2012-02-04 10:38:00.129+: 18828: error :
virSecurityLabelDefParseXML:2646 :
[please don't top-post on technical lists]
On 02/04/2012 03:43 AM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
Not sure if related, but after syncing libvirt to latest master branch I
see following errors:
2012-02-04 10:38:00.119+: 18828: error :
virSecurityLabelDefParseXML:2646 : XML error: security label is
On 02/04/2012 06:17 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/04/2012 03:43 AM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
Not sure if related, but after syncing libvirt to latest master branch I
see following errors:
2012-02-04 10:38:00.119+: 18828: error :
virSecurityLabelDefParseXML:2646 : XML error: security label is
On 02/02/2012 10:53 AM, Cheer Xiao wrote:
2012/2/2 Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com:
... [snip] ...
Okay, libvirt is detecting things correctly. So why is virt-manager confused?
Using that capabilities output works for me.
What virt-manager version are you using? Can you run virt-manager
Commit b170eb99 introduced a bug: domains that had an explicit
seclabel type='none'/ when started would not be reparsed if
libvirtd restarted. It turns out that our testsuite was not
exercising this because it never tried anything but inactive
parsing. Additionally, the live XML for such a
On 02/03/2012 01:48 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/28/2012 07:53 AM, Guannan Ren wrote:
*virDomainSetNumaParameters
*virDomainGetNumaParameters
---
python/Makefile.am |4 +-
python/libvirt-override-api.xml | 13 ++
python/libvirt-override.c | 314
Original Message
Subject: oVirt Beijing - March 21st
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:52:41 -0500
From: Carl Trieloff cctriel...@redhat.com
Spread the word/ come join us!
http://www.ovirt.org/news-and-events/workshop/
Carl
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
Hmm, this patch does not seem to fix my issue. See the both xml files in
the attachment.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
Commit b170eb99 introduced a bug: domains that had an explicit
seclabel type='none'/ when started would not be reparsed if
libvirtd