On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:08:25 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> >> A disabled guest CPU is represented as halted in the QEMU object model
> >> and can therefore be identified by the QMP query-cpus command.
> >>
> >> The initial patch proposal to expose this via virsh
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:50:14 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> (CCing qemu-devel)
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:21:59AM -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:19:38 +
> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
&g
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 11:01:37 -0500
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:54:15 +
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > > > The most important question I have is: does this solution satisfy the
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:51:23 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 02.02.2018 16:22, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:08:25 +0100
> > Viktor Mihajlovski <mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>&g
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:54:15 +
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > The most important question I have is: does this solution satisfy the
> > > needs of upper management? That is, if we implement the solution suggested
> > > by Eduardo than the feature of automatically
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:42:49 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> > On 02.02.2018 17:01, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> [...]
> > > o Make qemuDomainRefreshVcpuHalted() s390-only in libvi
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:49:54 -0500
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:41:44 -0200
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2 F
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:09:12 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 01:50:33PM -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:42:49 -0200
> > Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:41:44 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:09:12 -0200
> > Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > Your
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:47:27 +
Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:43:15PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> > On 02.02.2018 21:41, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:10:18 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 05.02.2018 16:37, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:47:27 +
> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 20:50:20 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> [...]
> > However, IMHO, what we really want is to add an API to the guest agent
> > to export the CPU online bit from t
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 11:29:46 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski <mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 01.02.2018 21:26, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:15:15PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> >> 2018-02-01 12:54-0500, Luiz Capitulino:
> >>>
>
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo