Hi,
On 02/09/2012 09:27 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/09/2012 01:04 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I'm still working on the RBD (RADOS / Ceph) storage driver for libvirt
and I noticed the virStorageVolDownload and virStorageVolWipe methods.
I assumed those would be passed on to the storage
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java | 11 +++
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java
b/src/main/java/org
On 03/09/2012 03:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/09/2012 07:23 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollanderw...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java | 11 +++
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java | 11 +++
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java
b/src/main/java/org
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java | 11 +--
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java
b/src/main/java/org
000..056059a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
@@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
+/*
+ * storage_backend_rbd.c: storage backend for RBD (RADOS Block Device) handling
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Wido den Hollander
+ *
+ * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify
Hi,
On 03/30/2012 11:04 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This patch adds support for a new storage backend with RBD support.
RBD is the RADOS Block Device and is part of the Ceph distributed storage
system.
It comes in two flavours: Qemu-RBD and Kernel RBD, this storage backend only
supports
The current storage pools for NFS and iSCSI only require one host to
connect to. Future storage pools like RBD and Sheepdog will require
multiple hosts.
This patch allows multiple source hosts and rewrites the current
storage drivers.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src
The current storage pools for NFS and iSCSI only require one host to
connect to. Future storage pools like RBD and Sheepdog will require
multiple hosts.
This patch allows multiple source hosts and rewrites the current
storage drivers.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src
On 04/18/2012 12:36 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This patch adds support for a new storage backend with RBD support.
RBD is the RADOS Block Device and is part of the Ceph distributed storage
system.
It comes in two flavours
From: root root@kvm01.(none)
This for example prohibits you to use iotune for Ceph or Sheepdog devices.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c |4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
index
On 04/05/2013 05:36 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
From: root root@kvm01.(none)
My bad for this one, I noticed it to late.
Wido
This for example prohibits you to use iotune for Ceph or Sheepdog devices.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c |4
This for example prohibits you to use iotune for Ceph or Sheepdog devices.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c |4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
index 552a81b..464d30a 100644
--- a/src
Did this one get lost or forgotten?
Thanks,
Wido
On 04/05/2013 06:07 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This for example prohibits you to use iotune for Ceph or Sheepdog devices.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c |4
1 file changed, 4
Not all RBD (Ceph) storage pools have cephx authentication turned on,
so secret might not be initialized.
It could also be that the secret couldn't be located.
Only call virSecretFree() if secret is initialized earlier.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/storage
release (0.4.9) of libvirt-java doesn't.
I don't know if there are any objections, but if possible I'd like to
see 0.5.0 released so we get this new functionality for CloudStack.
We use maven for building CloudStack and it fetches libvirt-java from
libvirt.org/maven2
Thank you,
Wido den
RBD images are always in RAW format and should be displayed that way
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/conf/storage_conf.c |3 ++-
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c |2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/conf
On 08/15/2013 11:00 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hello,
In the recent months various new methods were added to libvirt-java
which we (Apache CloudStack) would like to use in our KVM code.
For example resizing storage volumes, right now we have to do this with
Bash scripting since although
On 08/30/2013 12:30 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
RBD images are always in RAW format and should be displayed that way
Did anyone get the chance yet to review it?
Thanks!
Wido
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/conf/storage_conf.c |3 ++-
src/storage
This new RBD format supports snapshotting and cloning. By having
libvirt create images in format 2 end-users of the created images
can benefit of the new RBD format.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 23 +--
1 file
On 09/12/2013 04:12 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:27:10AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This new RBD format supports snapshotting and cloning. By having
libvirt create images in format 2 end-users of the created images
can benefit of the new RBD format.
What's
On 09/13/2013 10:29 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:14:33AM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:31:55PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 08/15/2013 11:00 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hello,
In the recent months various new methods were added
On 09/13/2013 11:26 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/13/2013 10:29 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
[...]
I'm puzzled, how can the build be successful if the main jar is not
generated ???
Odd, I tried building the Deb
On 09/16/2013 07:58 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Raising this due to maven
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:26:24PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
[...]
Indeed that was the problem, I just commited the fix, thanks
On 12/11/2013 03:47 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This new RBD format supports snapshotting and cloning. By having
libvirt create images in format 2 end-users of the created images
can benefit of the new RBD format.
Older versions of libvirt can work with this new RBD format as long
as librbd
On 01/02/2014 08:42 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 12/11/2013 03:47 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This new RBD format supports snapshotting and cloning. By having
libvirt create images in format 2 end-users
On 12/11/2013 03:47 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This new RBD format supports snapshotting and cloning. By having
libvirt create images in format 2 end-users of the created images
can benefit of the new RBD format.
Older versions of libvirt can work with this new RBD format as long
as librbd
by librbd since
version 0.56 (Ceph Bobtail).
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
index
On 01/30/2014 02:02 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On 12/11/2013 03:47 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
This new RBD format supports snapshotting and cloning. By having
libvirt create images in format 2 end-users of the created images
can benefit of the new RBD format.
Older versions of libvirt can work
These timeout values make librados/librbd return -ETIMEDOUT when a
operation is blocking due to a failing/unreachable Ceph cluster.
By having the operations time out libvirt will not block.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff
With this information it's easier for the user to debug what is
going wrong.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 119 +
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
these timeout options
nothing happens. libvirt compiles and runs just fine, but the timeout simply
won't work.
Wido den Hollander (3):
rbd: Include return statusses from librados/librbd in logging
rbd: Simplify opening RADOS IoCTX
rbd: Set timeout options for librados
src/storage
Reduces code and brings logging back to one function.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 43 ++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
index bd21873..8d1e320
is down. Librados will then not block for ever, but
return a -ETIMEDOUT so libvirt does not block for ever.
Wido den Hollander (2):
rbd: Include return statusses from librados/librbd in logging
rbd: Set timeout options for librados
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 144
With this information it's easier for the user to debug what is
going wrong.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 127 ++---
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
These timeout values make librados/librbd return -ETIMEDOUT when a
operation is blocking due to a failing/unreachable Ceph cluster.
By having the operations time out libvirt will not block.
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff
On 09/16/2013 07:58 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Raising this due to maven
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:26:24PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
[...]
Indeed that was the problem, I just commited the fix, thanks
On platforms with Java 1.7 it will still produce compatible code
with Java 1.6 platforms
Java 1.6 is still out there and widely used.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
build.properties |2 ++
build.xml|4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions
On 09/17/2013 09:23 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 09:04:46AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/16/2013 07:58 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Raising this due to maven
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:26:24PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13:53AM
On 09/17/2013 11:13 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:09:36AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/17/2013 09:23 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 09:04:46AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/16/2013 07:58 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Raising
On 09/17/2013 01:14 PM, Claudio Bley wrote:
At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:04:59 +0200,
Wido den Hollander wrote:
On platforms with Java 1.7 it will still produce compatible code
with Java 1.6 platforms
Java 1.6 is still out there and widely used.
AFAIK, the code is 1.5 compliant which would
On 09/17/2013 02:58 PM, Claudio Bley wrote:
At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:48:11 +0200,
Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/17/2013 01:14 PM, Claudio Bley wrote:
At Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:04:59 +0200,
Wido den Hollander wrote:
On platforms with Java 1.7 it will still produce compatible code
with Java 1.6
of
librbd do.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 23 +--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
index 4b6f18c..f3dd7a0 100644
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java
index e68d9ed..dbd8f6c 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java
index fc1f665..4b4c572 100644
--- a/src/main/java
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 24 +---
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java
index 4b4c572..e0be43d 100644
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/StorageVol.java |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/StorageVol.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt/StorageVol.java
index 66e647f..9ea23c7 100644
--- a/src/main/java
This enables use a different XML for running the guest on the target host.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 54 ++--
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |2 ++
2 files changed, 54 insertions
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java
index d393960..932f56c 100644
The migrateToURI method now uses virDomainMigrateToURI2 so we can support
some more features.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 33 +---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |2 ++
2 files changed
Hello,
This series of patches adds functionality to libvirt-java for:
* block device resizing
* snapshot handling
* domain migration
All these patches originate from the Apache CloudStack project
and were written during development of new featurs for CloudStack.
Thank you,
Wido
--
libvir-list
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 15 +++
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |1 +
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/StorageVol.java | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/StorageVol.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt/StorageVol.java
index 1bed6e1..66e647f 100644
--- a/src
On 01/08/2013 09:18 AM, Claudio Bley wrote:
At Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:10:16 -0700,
Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/05/2013 04:48 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
The migrateToURI method now uses virDomainMigrateToURI2 so we can support
some more features.
+public int migrateToURI(String dconnuri
Hi,
I just wanted to build the latest libvirt-java master on my Ubuntu 12.04
laptop and it failed due to this commit.
The commit message says: Use JNA's Native.free() method to free memory.
This requires JNA version 3.3.0 or later.
Ubuntu 12.04 comes with JNA 3.2.7-4, so the build fails.
This adds the blockResize() method to the Domain class
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 17 +
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |1 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org
Hi,
I've sent a series of patches like these about two weeks ago and got
some great feedback from Claudio on those!
The feedback from Claudio has been used for writing this series of patches.
Backwards compatibility has been preserved by still using virDomainMigrate
and virtDomainMigrateToUri
We divert from the one-on-one mapping rule here by not adding the
undefineFlags() method
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 24
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |1 +
2 files changed, 25
The original implementation doesn't have a argument for passing flags. It is
however still there for backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Domain.java | 24 ++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions
Hello Claudio,
On 01/23/2013 04:13 PM, Claudio Bley wrote:
Hello Wido,
At Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:09:22 +0100,
Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I've sent a series of patches like these about two weeks ago and got
some great feedback from Claudio on those!
The feedback from Claudio has been used
/storage_backend_rbd.c
@@ -0,0 +1,544 @@
+/*
+ * storage_backend_rbd.c: storage backend for RBD (RADOS Block Device) handling
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Wido den Hollander
+ *
+ * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ * License
Hi,
On 05/26/2012 04:28 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/16/2012 04:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollanderw...@widodh.nl
---
No commit message explaining why this is needed?
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java | 11 +--
src/main/java/org/libvirt
Hi,
On one of my systems I'm having troubles with my RBD storage backend.
At first I thought it was a problem with my code, but after trying the
same code on a second machine I'm a bit confused.
The problem is that the storage backend tries to retrieve the value of a
secret and base64
down arguments to
Qemu.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/qemu/qemu_command.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
index 6549f57..1c59695 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
On 06/26/2012 05:37 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:12:46PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java | 11 +++
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |1 +
2
= conn.secretLookupByUUIDString(uuuid);
String value = new String(secret.getValue());
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/Secret.java | 13 ++---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4
On 06/26/2012 10:07 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
We break the API with this, but Java does not support multiple method
signatures with different return types.
The old method returned a String, but since a secret can be binary data this
type is not suited.
Users who now that their secret
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/main/java/org/libvirt/StoragePool.java |2 +-
src/main/java/org/libvirt/jna/Libvirt.java |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/libvirt/StoragePool.java
b/src/main/java/org/libvirt
On 06/25/2012 04:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:37:48PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
On one of my systems I'm having troubles with my RBD storage backend.
At first I thought it was a problem with my code, but after trying
the same code on a second machine
On 25-06-12 16:54, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Notice this behavior:
root@stack01:~# virsh secret-set-value
322bccea-f2ed-4eae-a7e5-d0793ffb162d
AQAE+uJPCFpELBAAkTniQvHabBGj0Quwnu2imA==
Secret value set
root@stack01:~# md5sum
/etc/libvirt/secrets/322bccea-f2ed-4eae-a7e5-d0793ffb162d.base64
On 03-07-12 15:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
That is really bizarre. Can you look at what is actually stored
in the .base64 file each time ? And what 'secret-get-value'
replies with ?
I haven't been able to look into this any further, however: I just
downloaded 0.9.13 from the libvirt
On 03-07-12 16:54, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 03-07-12 15:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
That is really bizarre. Can you look at what is actually stored
in the .base64 file each time ? And what 'secret-get-value'
replies
On 03-07-12 17:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Yes, there is memory corruption somewhere. I never used valgrind
before, but the output seems to show.
I ran libvirtd inside a screen, I've attached the screenlog with all
On 04-07-12 10:45, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:24:38AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 03-07-12 17:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Yes, there is memory corruption somewhere. I never used
On 04-07-12 14:08, Eric Blake wrote:
[adding gnulib]
On 07/04/2012 02:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
==6825==
==6825== Invalid read of size 4
==6825==at 0xA57E4B9: base64_encode (in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libroken.so.18.1.0)
==6825==by 0x10DDBC98: base64_encode_alloc
On 05-07-12 10:20, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:07:31AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
We break the API with this, but Java does not support multiple method
signatures with different return types.
The old method returned a String, but since a secret can be binary data
On 12-07-12 14:32, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 02:20:11PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:42:20PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:23:21AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
I think this comes from rbd support, from
Currently the Java bindings for libvirt do not provide a Debian package.
Users with Debian based systems like Ubuntu are now forced to compile from
source since
no binary distribution of the JAR file is available.
This patch adds building Debian packages with ant
$ ant deb
This will build a
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
build.xml | 19 +++
debian/control.in |9 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 debian/control.in
diff --git a/build.xml b/build.xml
index 606cdaa..eefd08c 100644
--- a/build.xml
+++ b
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 21:13 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
The current support for qemu and Ceph RBD (rados block device) has two
main deficiencies: authentication doesn't work, and it relies on
environment variables (which don't work with latest upstream). This
patch set addresses both those
Hi,
I'm working on a storage backend for libvirt which needs credentials to
access the storage pool. I want to use the build in secret manager from
libvirt, but it seems I do not have access to the secretDriver in a
storage backend?
static int virStorageBackendRBDRefreshPool(virConnectPtr
On 01/03/2012 12:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 01:26:54PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a storage backend for libvirt which needs credentials
to access the storage pool. I want to use the build in secret
manager from libvirt, but it seems I do
Hi,
I'm still working on the RBD (RADOS / Ceph) storage driver for libvirt
and I noticed the virStorageVolDownload and virStorageVolWipe methods.
I assumed those would be passed on to the storage backend, but it doesn't.
In the storageDriver the method storageVolumeDownload simply opens a
Hi,
On 02/09/2012 09:27 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/09/2012 01:04 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I'm still working on the RBD (RADOS / Ceph) storage driver for libvirt
and I noticed the virStorageVolDownload and virStorageVolWipe methods.
I assumed those would be passed on to the storage
Hi,
Is de /maven2 [0] directory at libvirt.org still maintained?
It currently contains up to libvirt-java 0.4.7, while 0.4.8 is out.
If it is still maintained, could 0.4.8 be added?
Thanks!
Wido
[0]: http://www.libvirt.org/maven2/org/libvirt/libvirt/
--
libvir-list mailing list
On 07/19/2012 07:33 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
build.xml | 19 +++
debian/control.in |9 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 debian/control.in
diff --git a/build.xml b
On 07/08/2012 07:51 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
If its better to just do it in libvirt config.h, then we
can do that too
Yes, doing '#define foo libvirt_foo' in config.h is the preferred way
of achieving a namespace clean shared library.
There are two ways to generate
On 08/02/2012 01:37 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 01:18:12PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/08/2012 07:51 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
If its better to just do it in libvirt config.h, then we
can do that too
Yes, doing '#define foo
On 08/02/2012 01:00 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/01/2012 08:51 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/19/2012 07:33 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
build.xml | 19 +++
debian/control.in |9 +
2 files
On 08/10/2012 07:50 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:44:41AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
Is de /maven2 [0] directory at libvirt.org still maintained?
It currently contains up to libvirt-java 0.4.7, while 0.4.8 is out.
If it is still maintained, could 0.4.8
Hi,
At the CloudStack project we are switching to Maven for building and
resolving external dependencies.
In the central Maven repository [0] the latest version of libvirt-java
is however 0.4.7
Could 0.4.8 be uploaded to this repository?
Thank you,
Wido
[0]:
On 09/06/2012 10:38 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:18:22AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
At the CloudStack project we are switching to Maven for building and
resolving external dependencies.
In the central Maven repository [0] the latest version of
libvirt-java
On 09/06/2012 05:04 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:47:45PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:38 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I added libvirt.org as a manual repository and while fetching the
dependencies I saw:
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.cloudstack:xapi
On 09/10/2012 02:29 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:47:45PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/06/2012 10:38 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
it's maven which should fetch data from libvirt.org
and i though I had updated everything as needed:
http://libvirt.org
On 09/10/2012 03:23 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/10/2012 02:29 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
any idea how to tell the main maven site to refetch ? Even though we
added the checksums, http://search.maven.org still don't show
On 09/13/2012 02:19 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:46:43PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/10/2012 03:23 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/10/2012 02:29 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
any idea how
On 09/13/2012 02:19 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:46:43PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/10/2012 03:23 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/10/2012 02:29 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
any idea how
On 09/14/2012 04:59 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 04:18:21PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/13/2012 02:19 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:46:43PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/10/2012 03:23 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10
On 14-09-12 18:09, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:36:10PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/14/2012 04:59 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
[...]
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/maven-ant-tasks/2.1.3/maven-ant-tasks-2.1.3.pom
doesn't seems to have any
On 17-09-12 14:20, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 14-09-12 18:09, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:36:10PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 09/14/2012 04:59 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
[...]
http://repo1
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
