this demo a few days, it seems to be worked well.
But we are not sure is there any other problems , if the main thread and mlock
thread access one memory zone at one time without a mutex lock.
Is it workable?Or Is there any other idea to support memory reserved ?
Thanks
zhanghailiang
--
libvir-list
Il 05/03/2014 09:01, Zhanghailiang ha scritto:
Hi all：
Currently, we use cgroup(memory) to support memory QoS on KVM
platform, and use mlock on qemu to support memory reserved.
The mlock seems to be not appropriate.
Now qemu mlock memory in the main thread, which would lock
On 2015/3/7 0:24, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/04/2015 07:09 AM, zhanghailiang wrote:
'cancelling' status is introduced by commit 51cf4c1a, which is mainly avoid
s/is introduced/was introduced/
s/which is mainly avoid/mainly to avoid a/
possible starting a new migration process while
, but that the migration
is still properly cancelled. Newer libvirt will be patched to recognize
the new state without the odd error message.
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
---
migration/migration.c | 6
, but that the migration
is still properly cancelled. Newer libvirt will be patched to recognize
the new state without the odd error message.
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
---
migration/migration.c | 6 +-
1
' status only
occurs for a short window before the migration aborts, so for users,
if they cancell a migration process, it will observe 'cancelling' status
occasionally.
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
---
migration/migration.c | 6 +-
1 file
Hi,
Intel RDT/MBA has been supported by kernel for a time, we also support CAT in
libvirt, which is part of RDT.
but I didn't find any discussion or patches about MBA feature in Libvirt, does
anyone propose supporting it in
libvirt ?
Thanks,
Hailiang
--
libvir-list mailing list
