On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:24:37PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
The comment in kvm_max_vcpus() states that it's using the recommended
procedure from the kernel API documentation to get the max number
of vcpus that kvm supports. It is, but by always returning the
maximum number supported. The
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:24:37PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
The comment in kvm_max_vcpus() states that it's using the recommended
procedure from the kernel API documentation to get the max number
of vcpus that kvm supports. It is, but by always returning the
maximum number supported. The
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:20:45PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
This introduces a FeatureWord enum, FeatureWordInfo struct (with
generation information about a feature word), and a FeatureWordArray
typedef, and changes add_flagname_to_bitmaps() code and
cpu_x86_parse_featurestr() to use the
would like to get this into QEMU 1.4.
- The changes in this series should affect only users that are already using
the enforce flag, and I believe whoever is using the enforce flag
really
want the strict behavior introduced by this series.
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:28:57PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
On 01/09/2013 10:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:14:07AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/09/2013 01:39 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
Current seabios will try to boot from selected devices first,
if they are all
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:42:36AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 01:32:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:01:02PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
This is a cleanup that tries to solve two small issues:
- We don't need a separate
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:06:21AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:01:12PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
This adds the following feature words to the list of flags to be checked
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:09:24AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:42:53PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:42:36AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 01:32:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:01:02PM
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:19:15AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:06:38PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:06:21AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:01:12PM
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:30:40AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:15:59PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:09:24AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:42:53PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:42:36AM
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:15:14PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:00:09 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 04:27:19PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:01:11PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote
...@redhat.com
Cc: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com
Changes v2:
- Coding style fix
---
target-i386/cpu.c | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index 82685dc..e6435da 100644
hassle when
libvirt start using the enforce option.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
---
Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Cc: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
Cc: Jiri Denemark
feature is not supported by the
host (after we fix kvm_check_features_against_host() to check SVM flags
as well).
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
Changes v2:
- Coding style (indentation) fix
Cc: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
refuse to start if kvm_pv_eoi is not supported by the host (after we fix
kvm_check_features_against_host() to check KVM flags as well).
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
Changes v2:
- Coding style (indentation) fix
Cc: Gleb
: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.8001H:ECX.fma4
[bit 16]
Unable to find x86 CPU definition
$
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
But see the question below.
---
Cc: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
Cc: Marcelo
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 04:12:54PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:01:06PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The -cpu check/enforce warnings are printing incorrect information about the
missing flags. There are no feature flags on CPUID leaves 0 and 0x8000
.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
My goal is to eliminate the check_feat field completely, as
kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid() should now really return all the bits we
can set on all CPUID leaves.
---
target-i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file
(that are explicitly copied
from CPUID.01H.EDX), so we can make the code check/enforce all the
CPUID.8001H.EDX bits.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
target-i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
requested by the user or the
CPU model, but not supported by the host. And on these cases we
really want QEMU to abort if the enforce option is set.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
Cc: Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org
Cc: k
to ~0 on all entries.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
Changes v2:
- Coding style fix
---
target-i386/cpu.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:01:11PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
This will be necessary once kvm_check_features_against_host() starts
using KVM-specific definitions (so it won't compile anymore if
CONFIG_KVM is not set).
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
---
the
point of this patch: if a flag was not supported by the host and QEMU
wasn't aborting, it was a bug in the enforce code.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com
---
Cc: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com
Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: libvir-list
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:08:16AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Exactly. The types are no different, so there's no reason to
discriminate against types that happen to live in qemu-provided data
files vs. qemu code. They aren't instantiated, so we lose nothing by
creating the factories (just
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:59:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/26/2012 01:24 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
...
The command line becomes unstable if you use -nodefconfig.
-no-user-config solves this but I fully expect libvirt would continue to
use
-nodefconfig.
Libvirt uses
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:01:17PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/22/2012 12:14 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:37:39AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/22/2012 04:32 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:53:19AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
So
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:50:18PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:30:55PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:31:21AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:32:44AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
What does this mean
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 03:14:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/25/2012 03:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
qemu -M pc
Would effectively be short hand for -readconfig
/usr/share/qemu/machines/pc.cfg
In that case
qemu -cpu westmere
is shorthand for -readconfig
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:53:19AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
So, trying to summarize what was discussed in the call:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:08:10AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Let's say we moved CPU definitions to /usr/share/qemu/cpu-models.xml.
Obviously, we'd want a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:31:21AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:32:44AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:53:19AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
So, trying to summarize what was discussed in the call:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:08:10AM
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:04:19PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:52:27AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:12:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/11/2012 08:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:24:47PM -0600
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:32:21AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:15:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:04:19PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:52:27AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:50:18PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:15:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:04:19PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:52:27AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:55:34PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:53:38PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:50:18PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:15:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 18:47, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 12 March 2012 17:41, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Also keep in mind linux-user. There's no concept of a machine there, but
there's a cpu_copy() function used for forking
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:41:06PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 12.03.2012 17:50, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:49:47PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 17:16, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:33:15AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:15:26PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/09/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:56:52PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Resurrecting an old thread:
I didn't see any clear conclusion in this thread (this is why I am
resurrecting
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:58:43PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:42:46PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I could have sworn we had this discussion a year ago or so, and had
decided
that the default CPU models would be in something like
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:24:47PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Let's step back here.
Why are you writing these patches? It's probably not because you
have a desire to say -cpu Westmere when you run QEMU on your laptop.
I'd wager to say that no human has ever done that or that if they
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:12:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/11/2012 08:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:24:47PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Let's step back here.
Why are you writing these patches? It's probably not because you
have a desire to say -cpu
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:16:49AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If libvirt assumes anything about what kvm actually supports it is
working only by sheer luck.
Well the simple answer for libvirt is don't use -nodefconfig and
then it can reuse the CPU definitions (including any that the user
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:33:15AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/11/2012 09:56 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:12:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
-cpu best wouldn't solve this. You need a read/write configuration
file where QEMU probes the available CPU and records
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:41:32AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/11/2012 10:12 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:16:49AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If libvirt assumes anything about what kvm actually supports it is
working only by sheer luck.
Well the simple answer
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:42:44PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:54:15PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
Hi,
Recently I realized that all modern CPU models defined in
/etc/qemu/target-x86_64.conf are useless when qemu is used through libvirt.
That's because we
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:29:18AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do you have some more details on the kind of errors? Missing files,
permissions, something like this? Or rather something related to the
actual content of an image file?
Missing files due to wrong/missing NFS mounts, or
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:12:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:04:59PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:56:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:44:47PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:36:59AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/02/2010 05:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:12:08PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
In testing smbios mode='host'/, I noticed a couple of problems.
First, qemu rejected the command line we gave it (invalid
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:56:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:44:47PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:36:59AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/02/2010 05:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:12:08PM -0700, Eric
48 matches
Mail list logo
