于 2013年05月23日 06:19, Eric Blake 写道:
On 05/21/2013 09:15 PM, Zhang Xiaohe wrote:
Don't print 'OPTION' if there's no options. Just behaves as DESCRIPTION
does.
This mostly affects 'interface' command group.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaohezhan...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reported-by: Li Yangliyang.f
Don't print 'OPTION' if there's no options. Just behaves as DESCRIPTION
does.
This mostly affects 'interface' command group.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaohe zhan...@cn.fujitsu.com
Reported-by: Li Yang liyang.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
tools/virsh.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1
, will it?
So, why doesn't virsh support this and what do you think of adding
this feature?
Thanks
Zhang Xiaohe
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
于 2013年04月26日 11:35, Eric Blake 写道:
On 04/25/2013 09:19 PM, Zhang Xiaohe wrote:
hi guys,
It's hard for me to understand why doesn't virsh command support an
optional parameter because I think omitting a parameter and offering
a default value sometimes is quite convenient.
For example:
$ virsh
This patch makes '~' and '$HOME' can be recognized by virsh in
interactive mode. These two variables are replaced with real
path.
eg:
virsh # pwd
/home/libvirt
virsh # cd ~/rpmbuild
virsh # pwd
/root/rpmbuild
see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806793
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaohe
于 2013年03月21日 21:08, Eric Blake 写道:
On 03/21/2013 04:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In other words, if we're going to do this, go all the way and use
wordexp() to get shell-like expansion, instead of reinventing it
ourselves. Except that wordexp() is not portable to mingw, and not
provided
于 2013年03月22日 10:17, Eric Blake 写道:
On 03/21/2013 07:33 PM, Zhang Xiaohe wrote:
于 2013年03月21日 21:08, Eric Blake 写道:
On 03/21/2013 04:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In other words, if we're going to do this, go all the way and use
wordexp() to get shell-like expansion, instead of reinventing
于 2013年03月22日 11:43, Eric Blake 写道:
Expanding everything means re-implementing what the shell does.
wordexp() would be ideal for this, except that wordexp() is not portable
enough. By the time we end up rewriting enough code to do what
wordexp() already could do, we are adding lots of bloat
