On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 05:08:53PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 04:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
> >>
> >> It comes handy for management application
On 10/03/2017 04:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
>>
>> It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
>> per-device label so that it can uniquely identify
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
>
> It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
> per-device label so that it can uniquely identify devices it
> cares about. The advantage of this approach
On 10/02/2017 05:52 PM, Roman Mohr wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Michal Privoznik
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/29/2017 01:16 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:57:29 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 09/29/2017 09:52 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Michal Privoznik
wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 01:16 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:57:29 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> On 09/29/2017 09:52 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01 +0200, Michal
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:56:53PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 01:52 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:09:52PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >>> On 09/29/2017 10:49 AM, Daniel
On 09/29/2017 01:16 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:57:29 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 09/29/2017 09:52 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
It
On 09/29/2017 01:52 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:09:52PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> On 09/29/2017 10:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:09:52PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 09/29/2017 10:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > >>
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 10:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
> >>
> >> It comes handy for management application
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:57:29 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 09:52 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
> >>
> >> It comes handy for management application to be able
On 09/29/2017 10:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
>>
>> It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
>> per-device label so that it can uniquely identify
On 09/29/2017 09:52 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
>>
>> It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
>> per-device label so that it can uniquely identify devices it
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
>
> It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
> per-device label so that it can uniquely identify devices it
> cares about. The advantage of this approach
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:06:01 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
>
> It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
> per-device label so that it can uniquely identify devices it
> cares about. The advantage of this approach is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
per-device label so that it can uniquely identify devices it
cares about. The advantage of this approach is that we don't have
to generate aliases at define time (non trivial amount
16 matches
Mail list logo