Markus Armbruster writes:
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>> 08.06.2021 14:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
But union members in QAPI doesn't support
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 24.05.2021 21:37, John Snow wrote:
>> On 5/24/21 10:06 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 15.05.2021 01:38, John Snow wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:57 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
24.05.2021 21:37, John Snow wrote:
On 5/24/21 10:06 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
15.05.2021 01:38, John Snow wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:57 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated'
09.06.2021 13:49, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
08.06.2021 14:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
[...]
TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated'
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 08.06.2021 14:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
>>> But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated' feature. I tried
>>> to dig
08.06.2021 14:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
[...]
TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated' feature. I tried
to dig a bit, but failed :/ Markus, could you please help with it?
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
[...]
> TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
> But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated' feature. I tried
> to dig a bit, but failed :/ Markus, could you please help with it? At
> least by advice?
There are two
On 5/24/21 10:06 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
15.05.2021 01:38, John Snow wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:57 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated' feature. I tried
to dig a bit, but
15.05.2021 01:38, John Snow wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:57 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated' feature. I tried
to dig a bit, but failed :/ Markus, could you please help with it? At
least by
On 5/6/21 5:57 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated' feature. I tried
to dig a bit, but failed :/ Markus, could you please help with it? At
least by advice?
Oho, I see.
OK, I'm not
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:58:03PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Modern way is using blockdev-add + blockdev-backup, which provides a
> lot more control on how target is opened.
>
> As example of drive-backup problems consider the following:
>
> User of drive-backup expects that
Modern way is using blockdev-add + blockdev-backup, which provides a
lot more control on how target is opened.
As example of drive-backup problems consider the following:
User of drive-backup expects that target will be opened in the same
cache and aio mode as source. Corresponding logic is in
12 matches
Mail list logo
