Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-28 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:32:11AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote: On 27/08/2012, at 1:00 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: I tagged the rc2 in the git tree and pushed tarball and rpms to the usual place:

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-28 Thread Justin Clift
On 28/08/2012, at 6:05 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: snip I would suggest a fix along those lines: Daniel diff --git a/daemon/libvirtd.c b/daemon/libvirtd.c index 19dd26b..352d4fe 100644 --- a/daemon/libvirtd.c +++ b/daemon/libvirtd.c @@ -1312,17 +1312,21 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-28 Thread Jason Helfman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:05:36PM +0800, Daniel Veillard thus spake: I don't like too much the idea of adding kernel defines in our headers. Basically this is all due to commits d57567940153147f4d43875fb92c3030b3178b03 and

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-28 Thread Jason Helfman
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:32:11AM -0500, Doug Goldstein thus spake: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote: On 27/08/2012, at 1:00 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: I tagged the rc2 in the git tree and pushed tarball and rpms to the usual place:

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-28 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:05:36PM +0800, Daniel Veillard thus spake: I don't like too much the idea of adding kernel defines in our headers. Basically this is all due to commits d57567940153147f4d43875fb92c3030b3178b03 and

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-27 Thread Justin Clift
On 27/08/2012, at 1:00 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: I tagged the rc2 in the git tree and pushed tarball and rpms to the usual place: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ it should include the various fixes that were made on top of rc1 and fix the compilation problem exposed on OS-X, as well as

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-27 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote: On 27/08/2012, at 1:00 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: I tagged the rc2 in the git tree and pushed tarball and rpms to the usual place: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ it should include the various fixes that were made on top of

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-27 Thread Jim Fehlig
Doug Goldstein wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote: On 27/08/2012, at 1:00 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: I tagged the rc2 in the git tree and pushed tarball and rpms to the usual place: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ it should include the

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-27 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jim Fehlig jfeh...@suse.com wrote: Doug Goldstein wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote: On 27/08/2012, at 1:00 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: I tagged the rc2 in the git tree and pushed tarball and rpms to the usual

Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt-announce] Availability of 0.10.0 release candidate 2

2012-08-27 Thread Justin Clift
On 28/08/2012, at 2:32 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote: snip You can try something like the following to get you a little farther and see if it fails farther on. Just trying to see if we can get Mac OS X built and see what changes need to happen before 0.10.0 goes out final, not necessary proper