Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Revert "news: fix spelling of tunneled"

2017-02-16 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 02/16/2017 01:46 AM, Erik Skultety wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:53:40PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: Use of 'tunnelled' is over 100x that of 'tunneled' throughout the code. Also, the commit providing this news item used 'tunnelled'. I don't think it matters at all, both should be

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Revert "news: fix spelling of tunneled"

2017-02-16 Thread Erik Skultety
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:53:40PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Use of 'tunnelled' is over 100x that of 'tunneled' throughout the > code. Also, the commit providing this news item used 'tunnelled'. > I don't think it matters at all, both should be grammatically correct, it's just a matter of

[libvirt] [PATCH] Revert "news: fix spelling of tunneled"

2017-02-15 Thread Jim Fehlig
Use of 'tunnelled' is over 100x that of 'tunneled' throughout the code. Also, the commit providing this news item used 'tunnelled'. This reverts commit b5ac475f506cd13adab773cebd125a45d3f2ba8d. Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig --- Heh, so much for the trivial rule. I'll wait for an