I think the best way is to let libvirt to catch the abnormal exit signal
for the application. A default signal handler in libvirt will
un-register the event before the application exists abnormally.
On 2011-12-2 18:52, ShaoHe Feng wrote:
Hi Eric,
There's a question about register an Event.
Hi Eric,
There's a question about register an Event.
When user starts an application call
remoteDispatchDomainEventsRegisterAny to register an event.
And for some reasons, this application breaks down.
Will the libvirtd daemon know the application breaks down? And delete
the event?
if not,
On 10/13/2011 08:53 PM, shu ming wrote:
Also I think it would be better if we were able to connect to explicit
JSON
events, rather than a catch all. THe number of events from QEMU is only
going to increase over time as it does, a 'catch all' becomes
increasingly
bandwidth wasteful.
If I
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:46:06AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:54:08PM +0800, shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Shaohe Feng shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Basically, this feature can go along with qemu monitor passthrough.
That way, if we use new commands in the
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:54:13AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:46:06AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:54:08PM +0800, shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Shaohe Feng shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Basically, this feature can go along
On 2011-10-13 17:54, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:46:06AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:54:08PM +0800, shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Shaohe Fengshao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Basically, this feature can go along with qemu monitor
On 2011?10?10? 23:54, shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Shaohe Fengshao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Basically, this feature can go along with qemu monitor passthrough.
That way, if we use new commands in the monitor that generate new events, we
want
some way to receive those new events too.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:54:08PM +0800, shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Shaohe Feng shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Basically, this feature can go along with qemu monitor passthrough.
That way, if we use new commands in the monitor that generate new events, we
want
some way to
On 10/10/2011 11:54 PM, shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Shaohe Fengshao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Basically, this feature can go along with qemu monitor passthrough.
That way, if we use new commands in the monitor that generate new events, we
want
some way to receive those new events
From: Shaohe Feng shao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Basically, this feature can go along with qemu monitor passthrough.
That way, if we use new commands in the monitor that generate new events, we
want
some way to receive those new events too.
In order to test this patch, see the attached python test
10 matches
Mail list logo
