Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] conf: Allow omitting of numa node memory size

2017-02-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:04:08AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 15:36:23 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to > > > 0. Allow ommiting of

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] conf: Allow omitting of numa node memory size

2017-02-22 Thread Peter Krempa
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 15:36:23 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to > > 0. Allow ommiting of the parameter completely to specify the same. > > > > Partially

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] conf: Allow omitting of numa node memory size

2017-02-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to > 0. Allow ommiting of the parameter completely to specify the same. > > Partially resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217144 Does this

[libvirt] [PATCH] conf: Allow omitting of numa node memory size

2017-02-21 Thread Peter Krempa
Memory-less numa nodes could be specified by setting the memory size to 0. Allow ommiting of the parameter completely to specify the same. Partially resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217144 --- docs/schemas/cputypes.rng | 12