On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:59:31AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 02:53:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Historically we matched log filters with strstr(), and when switching to
> > fnmatch in cbb0fd3cfdc287f6f4653ef1f04a7cfb2ea51b27, it was stated that
> > we would
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 02:53:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Historically we matched log filters with strstr(), and when switching to
> fnmatch in cbb0fd3cfdc287f6f4653ef1f04a7cfb2ea51b27, it was stated that
> we would continue to match substrings, with "foo" being equivalent to
> "*foo*".
Historically we matched log filters with strstr(), and when switching to
fnmatch in cbb0fd3cfdc287f6f4653ef1f04a7cfb2ea51b27, it was stated that
we would continue to match substrings, with "foo" being equivalent to
"*foo*". Unfortuntely I forget to provide the code to actually make that
happen. Thi