On 10/26/11 8:01 PM, Roopa Prabhu ropra...@cisco.com wrote:
On 10/24/11 11:14 AM, Stefan Berger stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/20/2011 01:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhuropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are
On 10/27/2011 05:57 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
Also, looks like no where else in libvirt code we return errno. We only
print errno but always return -1. And the -ETIMEDOUT case in macvtap is an
exception, cause the upper layer requires the cause of this particular
error.
We have a few places
On 10/27/11 7:01 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/27/2011 05:57 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
Also, looks like no where else in libvirt code we return errno. We only
print errno but always return -1. And the -ETIMEDOUT case in macvtap is an
exception, cause the upper layer
On 10/20/2011 01:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhuropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to what the return variable is initialized to. Can be fixed
as a separate patch if needed.
From: Roopa Prabhu ropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to what the return variable is initialized to. Can be fixed
as a separate patch if needed. The scope of this patch is just
to fix the
On 10/20/2011 10:42 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhu ropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to what the return variable is initialized to. Can be fixed
as a separate patch if
From: Roopa Prabhu ropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to what the return variable is initialized to. Can be fixed
as a separate patch if needed. The scope of this patch is just
to fix the
On 10/20/11 10:22 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 10/20/2011 10:42 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhu ropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to
On 10/20/2011 01:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhuropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to what the return variable is initialized to. Can be fixed
as a separate patch if needed.
On 10/20/11 11:57 AM, Laine Stump la...@laine.org wrote:
On 10/20/2011 01:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhuropra...@cisco.com
Fixes some cases where 1 was being returned instead of -1.
There are still some inconsistencies in the file with respect
to what the return variable is
10 matches
Mail list logo
