Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-03-10 Thread Claudio Bley
At Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:18:21 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 19.02.2014 13:03, Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-03-10 Thread Claudio Bley
At Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:22:53 +0100, Claudio Bley wrote: At Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:18:21 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 19.02.2014 13:03, Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-24 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 19.02.2014 13:03, Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? src/esx/esx_driver.c |2 +-

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-24 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/19/2014 05:03 AM, Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? Yes, making that conversion as a separate patch for

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-24 Thread Jim Fehlig
Claudio Bley wrote: At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:19:35 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-21 Thread Claudio Bley
At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:19:35 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency?

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-20 Thread Jim Fehlig
Claudio Bley wrote: Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? src/esx/esx_driver.c |2 +- src/openvz/openvz_driver.c |2 +-

[libvirt] [PATCH] make virDomainGetMaxVcpus work on inactive domains

2014-02-19 Thread Claudio Bley
Signed-off-by: Claudio Bley cb...@av-test.de --- OK, how about this patch? While at it, should I convert the VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_* instances to VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_* instances for consistency? src/esx/esx_driver.c |2 +- src/openvz/openvz_driver.c |2 +- src/phyp/phyp_driver.c |