Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:12:33PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
We have to explicitly destroy TAP devices on FreeBSD because
they're not freed after being closed, otherwise we end up with
orphaned TAP devices after destroying a domain.
---
On 02/26/2014 08:57 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Conceptually ok, but I fear this impl will result in the logs getting
polluted with cannot delete tap device or similar log messages on OS
where TAP device deletion is automatic.
Do you have an idea about better way to do that?
Maybe add a
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:12:11AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/26/2014 08:57 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Conceptually ok, but I fear this impl will result in the logs getting
polluted with cannot delete tap device or similar log messages on OS
where TAP device deletion is automatic.
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:12:11AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/26/2014 08:57 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Conceptually ok, but I fear this impl will result in the logs getting
polluted with cannot delete tap device or similar log messages on OS
where
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:12:33PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
We have to explicitly destroy TAP devices on FreeBSD because
they're not freed after being closed, otherwise we end up with
orphaned TAP devices after destroying a domain.
---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 7 +++
1 file
We have to explicitly destroy TAP devices on FreeBSD because
they're not freed after being closed, otherwise we end up with
orphaned TAP devices after destroying a domain.
---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c