After fixing the last review comments on remote port searching (commit
a14b4aea512d6c3a42af56207a65ef10ac4a12a1), the commit right after that
wasn't modified accordingly, therefore two values weren't changed as
they should and the configurable ports don't work as expected.
This simple commit
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 15:48:19 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
After fixing the last review comments on remote port searching (commit
a14b4aea512d6c3a42af56207a65ef10ac4a12a1), the commit right after that
wasn't modified accordingly, therefore two values weren't changed as
they should and
On 08/31/2012 04:06 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 15:48:19 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
After fixing the last review comments on remote port searching (commit
a14b4aea512d6c3a42af56207a65ef10ac4a12a1), the commit right after that
wasn't modified accordingly, therefore two
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:09:39PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 08/31/2012 04:06 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 15:48:19 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
After fixing the last review comments on remote port searching (commit
a14b4aea512d6c3a42af56207a65ef10ac4a12a1),
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:31:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 08/31/2012 04:29 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:09:39PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
Hum, too bad that would have been good in 0.10.1, but after all
0.10.2 should not be too far away anyway ...
On 08/31/2012 04:29 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:09:39PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 08/31/2012 04:06 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 15:48:19 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
After fixing the last review comments on remote port searching (commit
