On 03/07/2012 12:18 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 03/07/2012 02:46 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 03/07/2012 12:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
The RPC code assumed that the array returned by the driver would be
fully populated; that is, ncpus on entry resulted in ncpus * return
value on exit. However, while
The RPC code assumed that the array returned by the driver would be
fully populated; that is, ncpus on entry resulted in ncpus * return
value on exit. However, while we don't support holes in the middle
of ncpus, we do want to permit the case of ncpus on entry being
longer than the array returned
On 03/07/2012 12:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
The RPC code assumed that the array returned by the driver would be
fully populated; that is, ncpus on entry resulted in ncpus * return
value on exit. However, while we don't support holes in the middle
of ncpus, we do want to permit the case of ncpus
On 03/07/2012 02:46 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 03/07/2012 12:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
The RPC code assumed that the array returned by the driver would be
fully populated; that is, ncpus on entry resulted in ncpus * return
value on exit. However, while we don't support holes in the middle
of
