On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 14:59 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> > I tried upgrading from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0 a bunch of times, but
> > I haven't been able to reproduce the failure you're
> > reporting: libvirt-guests is never started automatically.
> >
> > Can you provide more information? What
On 10/07/2016 05:04 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:42 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:19 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
Andrea,
there is another "side effect" of the Requires directive.
libvirt-guests gets automatically started when libvirt is
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:42 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:19 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> > Andrea,
> > there is another "side effect" of the Requires directive.
> > libvirt-guests gets automatically started when libvirt is updated to
> > v2.3.0. This has some
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 11:19 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> Andrea,
> there is another "side effect" of the Requires directive.
> libvirt-guests gets automatically started when libvirt is updated to
> v2.3.0. This has some rather nasty implications for the end users.
Mh, I don't see why that
On 10/07/2016 09:31 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:12 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
Daniel, Andrea,
have you looked into the change in behaviour caused by patch 4 of this
series? When libvirtd is stopped I get all my running domains suspended.
Restarting libvirtd now also
On 10/07/2016 09:31 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:12 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
Daniel, Andrea,
have you looked into the change in behaviour caused by patch 4 of this
series? When libvirtd is stopped I get all my running domains suspended.
Restarting libvirtd now also
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:12 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> Daniel, Andrea,
> have you looked into the change in behaviour caused by patch 4 of this
> series? When libvirtd is stopped I get all my running domains suspended.
> Restarting libvirtd now also causes a disruption since all domains are
Daniel, Andrea,
have you looked into the change in behaviour caused by patch 4 of this
series? When libvirtd is stopped I get all my running domains suspended.
Restarting libvirtd now also causes a disruption since all domains are
suspended and than resumed.
Before the commit of this patch the
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 14:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:55:20PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> >
> > Make libvirt on systemd nicer for the user, by getting rid of
> > some confusing behavior, and overall more solid.
> >
> > More details in each specific patch.
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:55:20PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Make libvirt on systemd nicer for the user, by getting rid of
> some confusing behavior, and overall more solid.
>
> More details in each specific patch.
ACK to all
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-
Make libvirt on systemd nicer for the user, by getting rid of
some confusing behavior, and overall more solid.
More details in each specific patch.
Andrea Bolognani (4):
virtlogd.socket: Tie lifecycle to libvirtd.service
libvirt-guests.service: Improve description
libvirt-guests.service:
11 matches
Mail list logo
