On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 14:37:04 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Probably due to copy-paste error we're storing asset tag into
> def->sku which we even use in the next step to store SKU number
> and thus the asset tag leaks.
>
> ==19200== 41 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 84
Probably due to copy-paste error we're storing asset tag into
def->sku which we even use in the next step to store SKU number
and thus the asset tag leaks.
==19200== 41 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 849 of 1,059
==19200==at 0x4C2AF0F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==1
