On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:53:17PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 15:41 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > Running syntax-check in all 5 scenarios isn't buying us anything,
> > > > as the syntax-check rules don't depend on what is installed in the
> > > > host. IOW,
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 15:41 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > Running syntax-check in all 5 scenarios isn't buying us anything,
> > > as the syntax-check rules don't depend on what is installed in the
> > > host. IOW, running syntax-check in 1 scenario is sufficient to get
> > > us the
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:35:32PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 15:06 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > - compiler: gcc
> > > >dist: precise
> > > > +# Special scenario to run distcheck, so we don't waste time
> > > > duplicating
> > > > +#
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 15:06 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > - compiler: gcc
> > >dist: precise
> > > +# Special scenario to run distcheck, so we don't waste time
> > > duplicating
> > > +# work in all the other scenarios. Doesn't work on precise due to the
> > > +#
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:02:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 12:00 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Running "make distcheck" ensures that we have CLEANFILES and uninstall
> > rules setup correctly, as well as validating VPATH builds succeeed.
> >
> >
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 12:00 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Running "make distcheck" ensures that we have CLEANFILES and uninstall
> rules setup correctly, as well as validating VPATH builds succeeed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
> ---
> .travis.yml | 5 +
>
Running "make distcheck" ensures that we have CLEANFILES and uninstall
rules setup correctly, as well as validating VPATH builds succeeed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
.travis.yml | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml