Joao Martins wrote:
> On 02/08/2017 04:17 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> Joao Martins wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2017 10:39 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
The typical pattern when calling libxl functions that populate a
structure is
libxl_foo foo;
libxl_foo_init();
libxl_get_foo(ctx,
On 02/08/2017 04:17 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Joao Martins wrote:
>> On 02/02/2017 10:39 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>> The typical pattern when calling libxl functions that populate a
>>> structure is
>>>
>>> libxl_foo foo;
>>> libxl_foo_init();
>>> libxl_get_foo(ctx, );
>>> ...
>>>
Joao Martins wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 10:39 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> The typical pattern when calling libxl functions that populate a
>> structure is
>>
>> libxl_foo foo;
>> libxl_foo_init();
>> libxl_get_foo(ctx, );
>> ...
>> libxl_foo_dispose();
>>
>> Fix several instances of
On 02/02/2017 10:39 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> The typical pattern when calling libxl functions that populate a
> structure is
>
> libxl_foo foo;
> libxl_foo_init();
> libxl_get_foo(ctx, );
> ...
> libxl_foo_dispose();
>
> Fix several instances of libxl_physinfo missing the init and
>
The typical pattern when calling libxl functions that populate a
structure is
libxl_foo foo;
libxl_foo_init();
libxl_get_foo(ctx, );
...
libxl_foo_dispose();
Fix several instances of libxl_physinfo missing the init and
dispose calls.
Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig
---