Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu: Change the default unix monitor timeout

2014-01-20 Thread Pavel Fux
at least in my case changing the value to 30 seconds is not enough, we had to change it to 5 minutes I suggest you let the user change it as he wishes. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Martin Kletzander mklet...@redhat.comwrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:11:07PM +, Daniel P. Berrange

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu: Change the default unix monitor timeout

2014-01-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:33:09PM +0200, Pavel Fux wrote: at least in my case changing the value to 30 seconds is not enough, we had to change it to 5 minutes What is the scenario in which you're seeing this problem ? Is it a problem when you are running lots of machines at once on a host ?

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu: Change the default unix monitor timeout

2014-01-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:22:06AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: There is a number of reported issues when we fail starting a domain. Turns out that, in some scenarios like high load, 3 second timeout is not enough for qemu to start up to the phase where the socket is created. Since the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu: Change the default unix monitor timeout

2014-01-16 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:11:07PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:22:06AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: There is a number of reported issues when we fail starting a domain. Turns out that, in some scenarios like high load, 3 second timeout is not enough for

[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu: Change the default unix monitor timeout

2014-01-09 Thread Martin Kletzander
There is a number of reported issues when we fail starting a domain. Turns out that, in some scenarios like high load, 3 second timeout is not enough for qemu to start up to the phase where the socket is created. Since the timeout is configurable and there is no downside of waiting longer, raise