On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:44:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:39:56PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 30.10.2014 16:04, Martin Kletzander wrote:
When one domain is being undefined and at the same time started, for
example, there is a possibility of a rare
On 31.10.2014 07:35, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:44:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:39:56PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 30.10.2014 16:04, Martin Kletzander wrote:
When one domain is being undefined and at the same time started, for
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:28:49PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 31.10.2014 07:35, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:44:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:39:56PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 30.10.2014 16:04, Martin Kletzander wrote:
When one domain is being undefined and at the same time started, for
example, there is a possibility of a rare problem occuring.
- Thread 1 does virDomainUndefine(), has the lock, checks that the
domain is active and because it's not, calls
virDomainObjListRemove().
- Thread 2 does
On 30.10.2014 16:04, Martin Kletzander wrote:
When one domain is being undefined and at the same time started, for
example, there is a possibility of a rare problem occuring.
- Thread 1 does virDomainUndefine(), has the lock, checks that the
domain is active and because it's not, calls
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:39:56PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 30.10.2014 16:04, Martin Kletzander wrote:
When one domain is being undefined and at the same time started, for
example, there is a possibility of a rare problem occuring.
- Thread 1 does virDomainUndefine(), has the
