On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 04:02:07PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 5/7/19 4:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:34:44PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > Automated performance tests found that network-centric workloads suffered
> > > a 20 percent decrease when the host libvir
On 5/7/19 4:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:34:44PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Automated performance tests found that network-centric workloads suffered
a 20 percent decrease when the host libvirt was updated from 5.0.0 to
5.1.0. On the test hosts libvirtd is enabled to
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:34:44PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Automated performance tests found that network-centric workloads suffered
> a 20 percent decrease when the host libvirt was updated from 5.0.0 to
> 5.1.0. On the test hosts libvirtd is enabled to start at boot and the
> "default" network
On 4/30/19 10:34 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Automated performance tests found that network-centric workloads suffered
a 20 percent decrease when the host libvirt was updated from 5.0.0 to
5.1.0. On the test hosts libvirtd is enabled to start at boot and the
"default" network is defined, but it is not
Automated performance tests found that network-centric workloads suffered
a 20 percent decrease when the host libvirt was updated from 5.0.0 to
5.1.0. On the test hosts libvirtd is enabled to start at boot and the
"default" network is defined, but it is not set to autostart.
libvirt 5.1.0 introduc
