On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:22:12PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 11/14/18 4:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:03PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> >> Sending as an RFC primarily because I'm looking for whether either
> >> or both mechanisms in the series is more
On 11/14/18 4:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:03PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Sending as an RFC primarily because I'm looking for whether either
>> or both mechanisms in the series is more or less desired. Likewise,
>> if it's felt that the current process of
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:21:03PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> Sending as an RFC primarily because I'm looking for whether either
> or both mechanisms in the series is more or less desired. Likewise,
> if it's felt that the current process of telling customers to just
> delete the cache is
Sending as an RFC primarily because I'm looking for whether either
or both mechanisms in the series is more or less desired. Likewise,
if it's felt that the current process of telling customers to just
delete the cache is acceptible, then so be it. If there's other ideas
I'm willing to give them a
