On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 14:32 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2015 09:45 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > During my testing, I've realized that even with the series applied
> > there's still one case in which we're unable to restore the previous
> > memory locking limit after removing the
On 12/11/2015 09:45 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> During my testing, I've realized that even with the series applied
> there's still one case in which we're unable to restore the previous
> memory locking limit after removing the last PCI hostdev from the guest.
>
> If an x86 guest contains a
During my testing, I've realized that even with the series applied
there's still one case in which we're unable to restore the previous
memory locking limit after removing the last PCI hostdev from the guest.
If an x86 guest contains a PCI hostdev in its XML definition, then the
memory locking
